Roger Waters-Gate

Ladies and gentlemen! In this corner, we have Roger Waters, the elderly and skinny rock legend, the genius behind every song you smoked weed to in college! And in this corner, we have Abraham Foxman, owner of the phrase Anti-Semite®.

By now, EVERYONE knows about the ADL’s allegations that Waters hates Jews a little (like that’s a big deal these days). Foxman said this, and Rogers said that, but who is right? I’ll tell you who is right.

The other night I attended Roger Waters’ production of The Wall in its completion.   A journalist friend of mine was kind enough to bring me along–this was not the sort of thing I would pay for. Rumor had it our seats were $500 each. On Tuesday night, however, I discovered two things: The Wall is very, very long. And Roger Waters dresses like Brandon Lee in The Crow (yes, the wardrobe even included a leather trench coat).

But as far as the controversial Star of Davids which appeared on the ridiculously large video screens following imagery of dollar signs during the song “Good Bye Blue Sky”? Who noticed. Everyone was stoned. The entire audience in the Garden was practically hot-boxing. However, as a diligent journalist, I paid close attention and yes, red Ma’agen Davids do drop from the sky along with crucifixes, Islamic moons, and other religious and capitalist symbols, but this politicized Lucky Charms cereal (no Purple Hearts, sadly) was the least offensive thing about the night. What’s offensive is Waters’ incredibly naive and idealistic political platform. Look, I hate war just as much as the next guy that hates war a lot, but our world peace solutions cannot be found in a two-and-a-half hour concept album packed with anarchist-flavored ambiguity. Perhaps The Wall was Rogers’ attempt to stay relevant during the rise of punk in the late 70’s, but thirty years after the album was first released, the flashing imagery projected all throughout the night of war, fighter jets, victims, soldiers, people crying (and during “Young Lust,” a topless stripper) felt simplistic and manipulative. And besides, how can Israel, or as Rogers alleges, the occupation, take him seriously and make peace with the Palestinians when he cant’s even get along with David Gilmour? I’m just saying–one real Pink Floyd reunion and maybe we would have a two state solution.

And now, here is the “controversial ” (not really controversial) performance:

[Incidentally, I had a very difficult time deciding on a title for this article. But the rejected options were “ADL Up Against the Wall,” or “Waters Comfortably Numb With ADL’s Accusation,” or “Hey You, Out There In the Cold Getting Anti-Semitic.” Just so you know.]

What do you think?

About The Author


The international media conspiracy and/or the new Jew review. Take your pick.

One Response

  1. Jonathan

    In the early eighties, performances of the Wall at Earl’s Court in London attracted neo-Nazis who identified with the message. There are clear fascist messages in the movie although the whole thing is basically ambiguous. In my experience most English anti-semitism is ambiguous and it’s relatively easy to ignore if you choose to.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This will close in 0 seconds